Which of the following is considered evidence when determining probable cause?

Sensory evidence such as sight, smell, or sound is critical when determining probable cause because it relies on the direct observations or perceptions of law enforcement officers. This type of evidence can provide tangible, immediate information that supports an officer's decision to take action, such as making an arrest or conducting a search.

For instance, if an officer smells marijuana in a vehicle or sees someone engaging in suspicious behavior that suggests a crime is happening, these sensory inputs contribute to forming a reasonable belief that a criminal offense may be taking place. This type of evidence is often deemed more reliable because it is based on direct experience rather than information or opinions that may lack substantiation.

Other options, while they may seem relevant, do not hold the same weighted credibility when establishing probable cause. Eyewitness accounts might contribute but require corroboration. Information solely from informants can be vague or unreliable if not substantiated by physical evidence or corroborated with additional observations. Lastly, public opinion and speculation are subjective and lack the solid foundation needed for legal determinations like probable cause, as they do not provide factual evidence that law enforcement can act upon.